Combined selective culture and molecular methods for the detection of carbapenem-resistant organisms from fecal specimens.

Detection of patients with intestinal colonization of carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO), or more specifically carbapenemase-producing (CP) CRO, can prevent their transmission in healthcare facilities and aid with outbreak investigations. The objective of this work was to further develop and compare methods that combine selective culture and/or PCR to rapidly detect and recover CRO from fecal specimens. Molecularly characterized Gram-negative bacilli (n = 62) were used to spike fecal samples to establish limit of detection (LOD; n = 12), sensitivity (n = 28), and specificity (n= 21) for 3 methods to detect CP-CRO: direct MacConkey (MAC) plate and Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid) on growth, MAC broth and Carba-R testing of the broth, and direct testing by Carba-R. This was followed by a clinical study comparing methods in parallel for 286 fecal specimens. The LOD ranged from 102-105 CFU/mL depending on the carbapenemase gene and method. Combined culture/PCR methods had a sensitivity of 100%, whereas direct Carba-R testing had a sensitivity of 96% for the detection of CP-CRO. All methods had specificities of 100%. The prevalence of CP-CRO (0.7%) and non-CP-CRO (5.2 %) were low in the clinical study, where all methods demonstrated 100% agreement. The three methods performed comparably in detecting CP-CRO. Direct Carba-R testing had a higher LOD than the combined selective culture methods, but this may be offset by its rapid turnaround time for detection of CP-CRO. The selective culture methods provide the benefit of simultaneously isolating CP-CRO in culture for follow-up testing and detecting non-CP-CRO.

Evaluation of the Direct MacConkey Method for Identification of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms from Rectal Swabs: Reevaluating Zone Diameter Cutoffs.

The optimal method to screen for gastrointestinal colonization with carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) has yet to be established. The direct MacConkey (direct MAC) plate method demonstrates high sensitivity for CRO detection, but established zone diameter (ZD) criteria for ertapenem (≤27 mm) and meropenem (≤32 mm) result in high rates of false positives upon confirmatory testing. To increase specificity, we screened for CRO in two high-risk wards using the direct MAC plate method, recorded ZDs for each sample, and generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the optimal ZD cutoff criteria. Of 6,868 swabs obtained over an 18-month period, 4,766 (69%) had growth on MAC plates, and 2,500 (36%) met criteria for further evaluation based on previously established ZDs around the carbapenem disks. A total of 812 (12%) swabs were confirmed positive for at least one CRO and included 213 (3%) carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO), resulting in a specificity of 78% for the direct MAC plate method. Reducing the ertapenem and meropenem ZDs to ≤25 mm improved specificity to 83%, decreasing the confirmatory testing workload by 32%. The sensitivities with the lower ZD criteria were 89% for CRO and 94% for CPO, respectively. The direct MAC plate method criteria for CRO testing can be modified to balance the sensitivity and specificity of CRO while reducing the burden on clinical microbiology laboratories. These modifications can be particularly helpful in regions with a low CRO prevalence.

Carbapenemase Detection among Carbapenem-Resistant Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing glucose-nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (CPNFs), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, is necessary to prevent their dissemination within health care settings. We performed a method comparison study of 11 phenotypic carbapenemase detection assays to evaluate their accuracy for the detection of CPNFs. A total of 96 carbapenem-resistant glucose-nonfermenting isolates were included, of which 29% produced carbapenemases. All CPNFs were molecularly characterized to identify ß-lactamase genes. A total of 86% of the carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates produced class B carbapenemases. Several assays performed with a sensitivity of >90% for the detection of carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa, including all rapid chromogenic assays and the modified carbapenem inactivation method. Most included assays, with the exception of the Manual Blue Carba assay, the Modified Carba NP assay, the boronic acid synergy test, and the metallo-ß-lactamase Etest, had specificities of >90% for detecting carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa Class D carbapenemases were the most prevalent carbapenemases among the carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii strains, with 60% of the carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii isolates producing acquired OXA-type carbapenemases. Although several assays achieved >90% specificity in identifying carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii, no assays achieved a sensitivity of greater than 90%. Our findings suggest that the available phenotypic tests generally appear to have excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. However, further modifications to existing assays or novel assays may be necessary to accurately detect carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii.

Comparison of 11 Phenotypic Assays for Accurate Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Early identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is essential to prevent their dissemination within health care settings. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of 11 phenotypic assays for the detection of CPE. Two collections of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates were evaluated, including 191 retrospective isolates (122 CP-CRE and 69 non-CP isolates) as well as 45 prospective clinical isolates (15 CP-CRE and 30 non-CP-CRE) obtained over a 3-month period. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was determined, with molecular genotype serving as the gold standard. Among the retrospective cohort, sensitivities ranged from 72% for the boronic acid synergy test for the detection of KPC producers to ≥98% for the modified Carba NP, the Rapidec Carba NP, the manual Blue Carba, and the modified carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of any CPE. Sensitivity differed among tests across enzyme classes. All assays had excellent specificity exceeding 95%, with the exception of the boronic acid synergy test (88%) and modified Hodge test (91%). Prospectively, 45 CRE isolates were encountered over a 3-month period, including 15 CPE (33%) and 30 non-CP-CRE (67%). Results from the prospective cohort were similar. However, a decrease in specificity was observed across most tests, likely due to restricted inclusion of non-CP-CRE to assess the specificity of the assays. Overall, accuracy of CPE detection varied across phenotypic tests. Local epidemiology of CP genotypes, turnaround time, and ease of incorporation into the laboratory workflow should be considered when selecting a phenotypic assay for clinical use.